GIS user technology news

News, Business, AI, Technology, IOS, Android, Google, Mobile, GIS, Crypto Currency, Economics

  • Advertising & Sponsored Posts
    • Advertising & Sponsored Posts
    • Submit Press
  • PRESS
    • Submit PR
    • Top Press
    • Business
    • Software
    • Hardware
    • UAV News
    • Mobile Technology
  • FEATURES
    • Around the Web
    • Social Media Features
    • EXPERTS & Guests
    • Tips
    • Infographics
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Tradepubs
  • CAREERS
You are here: Home / *FEATURES / Career Tips / 2015’s Best & Worst Metro Areas for STEM Professionals

2015’s Best & Worst Metro Areas for STEM Professionals

January 14, 2015 By GISuser

With “getting a better job” being one of the most popular New Year’s resolutions in the U.S. and STEM (science, technology, engineering, math) jobs expected to grow 1.7 times faster than non-STEM professions between 2008 and 2018, the leading personal finance social network WalletHub conducted an in-depth analysis of 2015’s Best & Worst Metro Areas for STEM Professionals.

2015′s Best and Worst Metro Areas for STEM Professionals

2015′s Best and Worst Metro Areas for STEM Professionals

On the heels of our earlier report on the Best & Worst Cities to Find a Job, WalletHub analyzed the 100 most populated metropolitan statistical areas across 11 key metrics to help STEM professionals find the best markets for their valuable occupations. Our data set ranges from job openings per capita for STEM graduates to annual median wage growth for STEM jobs.

Best Metro Areas for STEM Professionals Worst Metro Areas for STEM Professionals
1 Houston, TX 91 Lakeland, FL
2 Austin, TX T-92 El Paso, TX
3 Raleigh, NC T-92 Stockton, CA
4 Denver, CO 94 Cape Coral, FL
5 Omaha, NE 95 Deltona, FL
6 Seattle, WA 96 Oxnard, CA
7 Oklahoma City, OK 97 Fresno, CA
8 Salt Lake City, UT 98 North Port, FL
9 Columbus, OH 99 Riverside, CA
10 Cincinnati, OH 100 Miami, FL

Key Stats

  • The job openings per capita for STEM graduates are 12 times higher in San Jose, Calif., than in North Port, Fla.
  • The percentage of all workers in STEM occupations is five times higher in San Jose, Calif., than in McAllen, Texas.
  • The projected number of STEM jobs needed in 2018 per capita is 13 times higher in Washington than in Baton Rouge, La.
  • The unemployment rate for people with a bachelor’s degree or higher is four times higher in Riverside, Calif., than in Ogden, Utah.
  • The annual median wage for STEM workers (adjusted for cost of living) is two times higher in Houston than in Honolulu.
  • The housing affordability for STEM professionals is two times higher in Winston-Salem, N.C., than in Honolulu.


For the full report and to see where your metro area ranks, please visit:
http://wallethub.com/edu/best-worst-metro-areas-for-stem-professionals/9200/

Filed Under: Career Tips, FrontPage Leader, People, Hires, Career Tips, Top Press Tagged With: careers, STEM Professionals

Editor’s Picks

LizardTech White Paper Reveals 12 Hidden Gems in GeoExpress Software

Apple Unveils All-New MacBook – The Notebook Reinvented

Web GIS Gets A Huge Boost From Esri – What’s New in ArcGIS 10.3

World LiDAR Market is Expected to Reach $921.2 Million by 2022 – Allied Market Research

See More Editor's Picks...

Recent Industry News

The Drift Between Early Notes and Final Case Files in Abuse-Related Legal Support

April 29, 2026 By GISuser

Aerial Surveys Int’l and Global Marketing Insights to Present GEOINT 2026 Workshop on Multi-Domain Geospatial Fusion for Automated Infrastructure Monitoring

April 24, 2026 By GISuser

Why Timing Matters More Than You Think With Spray Seal (And Why People Often Get It Slightly Wrong)

April 22, 2026 By GISuser

The Quiet Planning Stage Most People Don’t See When Building a Pool in Brisbane

April 22, 2026 By GISuser

Hot News

State of Data Science Report – AI and Open Source at Work

HERE and AWS Collaborate on New HERE AI Mapping Solutions

Virtual Surveyor Adds Productivity Tools to Mid-Level Smart Drone Surveying Software Plan

Categories

Copyright gletham Communications 2015 - 2026

Go to mobile version