GIS user technology news

News, Business, AI, Technology, IOS, Android, Google, Mobile, GIS, Crypto Currency, Economics

  • Advertising & Sponsored Posts
    • Advertising & Sponsored Posts
    • Submit Press
  • PRESS
    • Submit PR
    • Top Press
    • Business
    • Software
    • Hardware
    • UAV News
    • Mobile Technology
  • FEATURES
    • Around the Web
    • Social Media Features
    • EXPERTS & Guests
    • Tips
    • Infographics
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Tradepubs
  • CAREERS
You are here: Home / * PRESS / Environment / Oso Landslide Research Paves Way for Future Hazard Evaluations

Oso Landslide Research Paves Way for Future Hazard Evaluations

January 16, 2015 By GISuser

VANCOUVER, Wash. — The large landslide that occurred on March 22, 2014 near Oso, Washington was unusually mobile and destructive. The first published study from U.S. Geological Survey investigations of the Oso landslide (named the “SR530 Landslide” by Washington State) reveals that the potential for landslide liquefaction and high mobility are influenced by several factors, and the landslide process at Oso could have unfolded very differently (with much less destruction) if initial conditions had been only subtly different. 

A major focus of the research reported this week is to understand the causes and effects of the landslide’s high mobility. High “mobility” implies high speeds and large areas of impact, which can be far from the landslide source area. Because high-mobility landslides overrun areas that are larger than  normal, they present a significant challenge for landslide hazard evaluation. Understanding of the Oso event adds to the knowledge base that can be used to improve future hazard evaluations.

Computer reconstructions of the landslide source-area geometry make use of high-resolution digital topographic (lidar) data, and they indicate that the Oso landslide involved about 8 million cubic meters (about 18 million tons, or almost 3 times the mass of the Great Pyramid of Giza) of material.  The material consisted of sediments deposited by ancient glaciers and in streams and lakes near the margins of those glaciers. The landslide occurred after a long period of unusually wet weather. Prolonged wet weather increases groundwater pressures, which act to destabilize slopes by reducing frictional resistance between sediment particles.

The slope that failed at Oso on March 22, 2014 had a long history of prior historical landslides at the site, but these had not exhibited exceptional mobility.

The area overrun by the March 22 landslide was about 1.2 square kilometers (one-half square mile), mostly on the nearly flat floodplain of the North Fork Stillaguamish River. Additional areas were affected by upstream flooding along the river, which was partially dammed by the landslide. Eyewitness accounts and seismic energy radiated by the landslide indicate that slope failure occurred in two stages over the course of about 1 minute. During the second stage of slope failure, the landslide greatly accelerated, crossed the North Fork Stillaguamish River, and mobilized to form a high-speed debris avalanche. The leading edge of the wet debris avalanche probably acquired additional water as it crossed the North Fork Stillaguamish River. It transformed into a water-saturated debris flow (a fully liquefied slurry of quicksand-like material) that entrained and transported virtually all objects in its path.

Field evidence and mathematical modeling indicate that the high mobility of the debris avalanche was caused by liquefaction at the base of the slide caused by pressures generated by the landslide itself. The physics of landslide liquefaction has been studied experimentally and is well understood, but the complex nature of natural geological materials complicates efforts to predict which landslides will liquefy and become highly mobile.

Results from a suite of computer simulations indicate that the landslide’s liquefaction and high mobility were very sensitive to its initial porosity and water content. Landslide mobility may have been far less if the landslide material had been slightly denser and/or drier. Computer simulations that best fit field observations and seismological interpretations indicate that the fast-moving landslide crossed the entire 1-km-wide river floodplain in about one minute, implying an average speed of about 40 miles per hour.  Maximum speeds were even higher.

Only one individual landslide in U.S. history (an event in Mameyes, Puerto Rico in 1985 that killed at least 129) caused more fatalities than the 43 that occurred in the 2014 landslide near Oso.

The full paper, “Landslide mobility and hazards: implications of the 2014 Oso disaster” by R.M. Iverson et al. is published in the journal, “Earth and Planetary Science Letters” and is freely available online.

Oso Landslide Simulation.
Oso landslide simulation screen shot. (High resolution image) (Video)

Filed Under: Environment Tagged With: Oso Landslide

Top Press

The Global Expansion of Aueshah: A New Era of High Jewelry

April 11, 2026 By GISuser

KARACHI, PAKISTAN. The international luxury market is experiencing a profound shift. Consumers are increasingly rejecting mass-produced goods in favor of rarity, authenticity, and emotional depth. … [Read More...]

State of Data Science Report – AI and Open Source at Work

September 10, 2025 By GISuser

AI and Open Source at Work … [Read More...]

Topcon Announces Landmark Expansion of Topnet Live Network Across USA

January 26, 2025 By GISuser

LIVERMORE, Calif.---Topcon Positioning Systems has announced a significant expansion of its Topnet Live reference station network, introducing 200 new geodetic stations strategically positioned across … [Read More...]

Space Flight Laboratory (SFL) Announces Launch and Deployment of NorSat-4 Maritime Monitoring Microsatellite

January 19, 2025 By GISuser

Seventh Satellite Developed by SFL for Norway … [Read More...]

HERE and BMW Group extend partnership on AI-powered mapping system

January 8, 2025 By GISuser

HERE and BMW Group extend partnership on AI-powered mapping system for automated driving and enhanced road safety … [Read More...]

Everest Base Camp Helicopter Tour, Helicopter Return Trek, and Manaslu Circuit Trek: Which Nepal Adventure Is Right for You?

November 6, 2026 By GISuser

Almost everyone planning a Nepal trip runs into the same wall. You want the big mountains, you have a fixed number of days, and every itinerary you read seems to promise something … [Read More...]

SFL Missions Inc. Confirms Successful Deployment of Six HawkEye 360 Radio Frequency Detection Satellites with Advanced Capabilities

October 27, 2026 By GISuser

MĀHIA, New Zealand, 26 October 2026 – SFL Missions Inc. today confirmed the successful deployment of six radio frequency (RF) detection and geolocation satellites for HawkEye 360 … [Read More...]

Canadian-Built RoadEng 12 Uses AI to Find the Best Location for New Resource and Rural Roads

October 17, 2026 By GISuser

Vancouver, BC, Canada, October 15, 2026 – North Vancouver-based Softree Technical Systems today released RoadEng Version 12, used in more than 75 countries to locate and design … [Read More...]

Beyond the Map: How AI Image and Video Generation Is Changing Geospatial Communication

October 14, 2026 By GISuser

Ask anyone who has shipped a GIS project what the hardest part was, and the answer is rarely the spatial analysis. It is almost always the communication. A site suitability … [Read More...]

From Maternity to Everyday Wear: Building a Wardrobe That Grows With You

October 14, 2026 By GISuser

When I think about maternity clothing, I feel the biggest mistake is buying too many things at once. During pregnancy, your body keeps changing, and something that fits well today … [Read More...]

Copyright gletham Communications 2015 - 2026

Go to mobile version